Corrigendum

Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem: Volume 9, Edward III. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1916.

This free content was digitised using optical character recognition. All rights reserved.

Citation:

J. E. E. S. Sharp, E. G. Atkinson, J. J. O'Reilly, G. J. Morris, 'Corrigendum', in Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem: Volume 9, Edward III( London, 1916), British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/inquis-post-mortem/vol9/p460 [accessed 21 November 2024].

J. E. E. S. Sharp, E. G. Atkinson, J. J. O'Reilly, G. J. Morris, 'Corrigendum', in Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem: Volume 9, Edward III( London, 1916), British History Online, accessed November 21, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/inquis-post-mortem/vol9/p460.

J. E. E. S. Sharp, E. G. Atkinson, J. J. O'Reilly, G. J. Morris. "Corrigendum". Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem: Volume 9, Edward III. (London, 1916), , British History Online. Web. 21 November 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/inquis-post-mortem/vol9/p460.

CORRIGENDUM.

688. ROBERT BOURGCHIER.
The date of the missing writ of diem clausit extremum on Robert Bourgchier (No. 239) is given as 18 May on the authority of the Fine Roll. The entry on the Fine Roll follows immediately after an entry dated 18 May and is itself dated ut supra. The entry immediately following is a writ of diem clausit extremum, also dated ut supra, on John Hunteman, the original of which is extant (see No: 365) and dated 18 August. From internal evidence this appears to be about the right date for the writ on Robert Bourgchier and on closer examination of the Fine Roll the writ of 18 May is found to be misplaced among a number of writs of August. The reading 18 May should therefore be probably 18 August.
PreviousTable of contentsNext