Sheriffs' Court Roll, 1320: Membrane 17 (transcript pp.62-64)

London Sheriffs Court Roll 1320. Originally published by Centre for Metropolitan History, London, 2010.

Citation:

'Sheriffs' Court Roll, 1320: Membrane 17 (transcript pp.62-64)', in London Sheriffs Court Roll 1320, ed. Matthew Stevens( London, 2010), British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-sheriff-court-roll/1320/pp62-64 [accessed 3 December 2024].

Membrane 17


[p. 62] [m. 17]	Court for Foreigners held on Friday after the feast of St. Bartholomew, 14 Ed II [29^th. August. 1320]

capiatur attornatus	Agnes of Wenlok, executrix of the will of Walter of Wenlok, pl., appears v. Robert of Harle, kt., executor of the will of Richard of Harle and Burgea, relict of the said Richard. The defs. are attached to appear; but Burgea does not come. It is testified in court that Thomas, parson of St. Mary of Wolcherchehawe, co-executor of the said Agnes, is so ill that he cannot come without peril of his body. Therefore the sergeant is ordered to go and receive from him his attorney etc.

	Saunz Arnald attached v. William of Arondel in a plea of trespass.
	Martin of Eltham, taverner, distrained v. Nicholas of Denesle in a plea of debt.
	Manent Francisci, attached v. Guy Jacobi and Jacob Totti of Luca, citizens and merchants of London, in a plea of debt.
	John de la Myne of London, distrained v. Nicholas of Dynesle, parson of the church of Halstede in a plea of debt.
	Eleanor Beaumond, attached v. William le Haftere, jun., in a plea of debt.
	Brachin Huberti of Pulisis, better attached v. Guy Jacobi and James Totti in a plea of trespass.
	Denis of Bruges, servant of William of Gossesfeld, better attached v. Nicholas of Bentle in a plea of trespass.
vacat	Robert of Totteville better distrained v. [blank]
	Michael Mynot, better attached v. Reimund of Lymoges in a plea of trespass.
	Simon of Abyndore, better distrained v. Richard of Perers in a plea of the detention of a bill.
	The Prior of Bermundeseie and Brother William Cauche, monk of the house, better attached v. Thomas Bonrouncyn in a plea of trespass.
nihil habent separentur	Lawrence le Tornor of Eppyngehethe, Brother Thomas of Eppynggeburi, and Hugh of Pikeryngge, baker, executors of the will of John of Derby, parson of the church of St. Mildred, better attached v. William Wastel in a plea of debt.
	John Postle of Kyngestone, better attached v. Robert le Blunt in a plea of trespass.
	William atte Rie, better attached v. John Hamond - petit licenciam -, cook, in a plea of trespass.
	Luke of Berkwei, better attached v. John of Ware, 'stokfisshemongere', in a plea of debt.
	Robert of Kent, sen., attached by his body v. Robert of Westle, merchant, of Pene in Agenois, in a plea of debt.
	John Dosynoun, better attached v. Hugh le Fourbour in a plea of covenant.
	James Beauflour, citizen and vintner, better distrained v. Giles Fanward, merchant of Pene in Agenois, in a plea of debt.
	Margery, relict of Ralph of Farnham, better attached v. Robert of Donmowe in a plea of debt; and John Sausemer appears.
	Mary, relict of William of Goldygham, William Quynci, and William of Wedryngsete, executors of the will of the said William, better attached v. Roger le Botiller in a plea of debt.
[p. 63]	Isabella Knokyn, Thomas of Eytone, Roger Carels and Ralph Restwold, executors of the will of John Knokyn, better attached v. Roger Sauvage in a plea of debt.
	Ralph Beauflour, citizen and taverner of London, better distrained v. Berard de la Tour of Besaz in a plea of debt.
nihil habet	John Donewiz, clerk, better attached v. John Rastil in a plea of trespass.
	Roger of Kynebautone, attached by his body v. Reiner Piggesflessh in a plea of account.
	Thomas Frembaud, executor of the will of Nicholas Frembaud, better distrained v. Thomas Coke in a plea of debt.
	Walter Hudde of St. Albans, chaplain, attached by his body v. John of Perers, Reimund of St. Clements, Gerard of Biole and John of Stoketone, executors of the will of William Seruat, in a plea of account.
	The same Walter, attached by his body v. the same executors, in a plea of debt.
	John Hereward, attached by his body v. Henry of Bidik in a plea of account.
	Walter of Essex, better distrained v. Gilbert le Mareschal in a plea of debt.
	Ralph Beauflour, attached by his body v. Saunz Arnald of Castelion in a plea of account.
	Walter Crepyn, better distrained v. Robert Belebarbe in a plea of debt.

adhuc	Judgment between Richer [sic.] of Refham, kt., pl., and the Prior of Bermundeseie in a plea of covenant, in respite etc.

adhuc	Jury between John del Gout, pl., and Robert of Thame in a plea of debt, respited for default of jurors etc.

attornatus	Robert of Harle, kt., executor of the will of Richard of Harle, def., appoints as his attorney Reginald Wolleward v. Agnes of Wenloke and Thomas, parson of the church of St Mary of Wolcherchehawe, executors of the will of Walter of Wenlok, in a plea of debt.

manucapcio	Hugh of Hereford, 'seler', mainprises his attachment upon Robert of Harle, kt., at the suit of the executors of the will of Walter of Wenlok, concerning a debt of 42s. etc. [at this point the membrane has been cut]

[m. 17d.]	John of Cornhulle, surgeon, was attached to answer Alice of Stockyngge in a plea of trespass. The pl. complains that on Wednesday before the feast of St. Barnabas the Apostle, 13 Edward II [10^th June, 1320], the def. came to her in Fletestrete and, arrogating to himself the office of surgeon, undertook to cure her within the quindene of an infirmity of the feet from which she was suffering, for the sum of half a mark,-
[p. 64] patria	-and applied divers medicaments against the said infirmity. In consequence of his treatment, however, the pl. was within six days unable to put her feet to the ground and her malady became completely incurable. In spite of this, on Monday before the feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist next following [23^rd June] the def. entered her house with force and arms and carried off a blanket, two sheets and a super-tunic worth 20s., so that she suffered damage to the extent of 100m. The def. comes and denies the charge alleging that he did not undertake to cure the pl., and did not infect her feet with his medicaments, or enter her house against her will etc., and thereupon he puts himself upon his country. Afterwards a jury of the venue of Fletestrete comes and returns a verdict for the pl. They find that he carried off from her house goods to the value of 1m. She is awarded £30. 16s. 8d. damages. [Entry incomplete]

fecit legem vacat quia supra lex ad quindenam	John of Wroteham waged his law v. Roger le Rede concerning the charge that the said Roger did not pay him 18s. for a quarter of corn bought from him at Billinggesgate in 9 Edward II [1315-1316].