House of Lords Journal Volume 63: 10 September 1831

Die Sabbati, 10° Septembris 1831.

DOMINI tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:

PRAYERS.

Houston v. Mackenzie.

The Answer of Murdo Mackenzie Esquire to the Petition and Cross Appeal of Thomas Houston Esquire, of Creich, was this Day brought in.

Cabbell et al. v. Brock.

After hearing Counsel fully in the Cause wherein William Burridge Cabbell, and others, are Appellants, and James Brock is Respondent:

It is Ordered, That the further Consideration of the said Cause be put off sine Die.

Calder v. Aitchison & Co:

After hearing Counsel for the Appellant this Day upon the Petition and Appeal of John Calder, Fish Curer in Leith; complaining of an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session in Scotland, of the First Division, dated the 28th June 1831, disallowing the Bill of Exceptions; and praying, "That the same might be reversed, varied or altered, or that the Appellant might have such Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, should seem meet;" as also upon the Answer of George Aitchison and Company, Merchants in Leith, put in to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the Respondents in the said Appeal; the Counsel were directed to withdraw:

Interlocutor Affirmed, with Costs.

Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the said Petition and Appeal be, and is hereby dismissed this House, and that the Interlocutor therein complained of, be, and the same is hereby Affirmed: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellant do pay or cause to be paid to the said Respondents the Sum of One hundred Pounds for their Costs in respect of the said Appeal.

Scott v. Allnutt & Mackenzie.

After hearing Counsel, in Part, in the Cause wherein James Scott is Appellant, and John Allnutt and Thomas Mackenzie are Respondents:

It is Ordered, That the further Hearing of the said Cause be put off to Tuesday next.

Mackenzie v. Houston, et e con.

Ordered, That the Hearing of the Cause wherein Murdo Mackenzie Esquire is Appellant, and Thomas Houston Esquire is Respondent, et e contra, which stands appointed for this Day, be put off to Tuesday next.

Napier v. Goldie et al. et e con.

Ordered, That the Cause wherein John Napier Esquire is Appellant, and Alexander Goldie, and others, are Respondents, et e contra, be heard by Counsel at the Bar on Tuesday next.

Glendonwyn & Kennedy v. Goldie et al.

Ordered, That the Cause wherein Mrs. Ismene Magdalina Glendonwyn or Scott and Robert Kennedy are Appellants, and Alexander Goldie, and others, are Respondents, be heard by Counsel at the Bar on Tuesday next.

Bankruptcy Court Bill.

The House (according to Order) was adjourned during Pleasure, and again put into a Committee upon the Bill, intituled, "An Act to establish a Court in Bankruptcy."

After some Time, the House was resumed:

And The Earl of Shaftesbury reported from the Committee, "That they had gone through the Bill, and made several Amendments thereto, which he was ready to report, when the House will please to receive the same."

Ordered, That the said Bill, as amended, be printed.

Adjourn.

Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Lunæ, duodecimum diem instantis Septembris, horâ decimâ Auroræ, Dominis sic decernentibus.