Vatican Regesta 186: 1415 | British History Online

Calendar of Papal Registers Relating To Great Britain and Ireland: Volume 6, 1404-1415. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1904.

Citation:

'Vatican Regesta 186: 1415', in Calendar of Papal Registers Relating To Great Britain and Ireland: Volume 6, 1404-1415, ed. W H Bliss, J A Twemlow( London, 1904), British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/cal-papal-registers/brit-ie/vol6/pp514-515 [accessed 6 November 2024].

Lateran Regesta, Vol. CLXXXVI

Letters of the Council of Constance

Sacrosancta Et Generalis Synodus Constanciensis

Apostolica Sede Vacante



1415. 4 Non. Aug. Constance. (f. 31d.)	To the archbishop of Capua, the bishop of Cloyne (Clonen., corrected in the margin from Oloren.) and the archdeacon of Limerick. Mandate as below. The petition of Richard Pellyne, perpetual vicar of Kynsals (sic) in the diocese of Cork, contained that although he obtained the said vicarage on its voidance by the deprivation of John Correr alias Carrat by Richard, archbishop of Cashel, who had special authority from the apostolic see for the purpose, nevertheless the said John despoiled Richard of it and intruded himself, still detaining possession and taking the fruits, on account of which Richard appealed to the said see, which appeal and cause Balthasar Cossa, then pope John XXIII, committed, at Richard's instance, to Master Geminianus de Prato, papal chaplain and auditor, who, at the instance of Master Conrad Ludeking, substituted by Master Geoffrey Pellyne, proctor of the said Richard, cited the said John, and upon his contumacy at each stage of the process gave a definitive sentence against him, removed him from the said vicarage and restored Richard, imposed perpetual silence on John and condemned him in fruits received from the beginning of the suit and in costs, which costs he afterwards assessed at 38 gold florins of the camera. The said petition added that Richard fears lest whilst the cause was pending, others have intruded themselves or may do so in future. The Council therefore confirms the auditor's proceedings and orders the above three to execute them, to restore Richard or his proctor to corporal possession, removing John, and to cause satisfaction to be made to him in respect of the said fruits and costs. The sentence is to be executed against such other intruders as if it had been delivered against them. Exhibita nobis. [3½ pp.]
16 Kal. Sept. Constance. (f. 33d.)	To the bishop of Salisbury, and the precentor and official of Constance. Mandate in regard to a provision of a benefice in the diocese of Constance. Racioni congruit.
2 Non. Aug. Constance. (f. 294l.)	To the bishops of Salisbury, St. Asaph and Lichfield. Mandate as below. The petition of William Meloys, rector of Llanware in Deffrincleyd in the diocese of Bangor, contained that although he obtained the said church by collation of bishop Benedict, by his ordinary authority, on its voidance by the resignation to that bishop of John ap David ap Ithel, nevertheless John Gomeind, clerk, of the diocese of Hereford, opposed and hindered William's peaceable possession, as he still does; and that the cause between them was committed by Baldasar Cossa, then pope John XXIII, at William's instance, to Master Frederick Deys, papal chaplain and auditor, notwithstanding that it had not by its nature lawfully devolved to the Roman court, which auditor, at the instance of Master John de Scribanis (sic), William's proctor, cited the said John and upon his contumacy at each stage of the proceedings gave a definitive sentence against him, and condemned him in costs, which costs he afterwards assessed at 35 gold florins of the camera. The Council hereby confirms the auditor's sentence, orders the above bishops to execute it, removing John and inducting William into corporal possession, and causing satisfaction to be made to him in respect of fruits and the said costs, and, for the same reason as in the preceding, orders them to execute it against other intruders as though it had been pronounced against them.Exhibita nobis. [4 pp. See above, pp. 492, 493.]