469 Nowell v Marchland

The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640.

This free content was Born digital. CC-NC-BY.

Citation:

Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '469 Nowell v Marchland', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640, ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/469-nowell-marchland [accessed 21 November 2024].

Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '469 Nowell v Marchland', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Edited by Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online, accessed November 21, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/469-nowell-marchland.

Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper. "469 Nowell v Marchland". The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online. Web. 21 November 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/469-nowell-marchland.

In this section

469 NOWELL V MARCHLAND

Thomas Nowell of St Michael, Wood Street, London, gent v Oliver Marchland

February 1639

Abstract

The cause of Nowell's complaint against Marchland remains unknown, but by 9 February 1639 a settlement had been agreed between the parties.

Summary of proceedings

Dr Merrick acted as counsel. On 9 February 1639 a peace had been agreed between the parties, whereupon proceedings were relaxed.

Notes

Neither party appears in the Visitations of London: J. J. Howard and J. L. Chester (eds.), The Visitation of London, 1633, 1634 and 1635, vol. I (Publications of the Harleian Society, 15, 1880); J. J. Howard (ed.), The Visitation of London, 1633, 1634 and 1635, vol. II (Publications of the Harleian Society, 17, 1883); J. B. Whitmore and A. W. Hughes Clarke (ed.), London Visitation Pedigrees, 1664 (Publications of the Harleian Society, 92, 1940).

Documents

  • Proceedings
    • Proceedings: 1/7, fos. 36-47 (9 Feb 1639)

People mentioned in the case

  • Marchland, Oliver
  • Merrick, William, lawyer
  • Nowell, Thomas, gent

Places mentioned in the case

  • London
    • St Michael, Wood Street

Topics of the case

  • arbitration