The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640.
This free content was Born digital. CC-NC-BY.
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '170 Doyley v Jefferies', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640, ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/170-doyley-jefferies [accessed 21 November 2024].
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '170 Doyley v Jefferies', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Edited by Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online, accessed November 21, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/170-doyley-jefferies.
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper. "170 Doyley v Jefferies". The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online. Web. 21 November 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/170-doyley-jefferies.
In this section
170 DOYLEY V JEFFERIES
Edward Doyley, gent v Francis Jefferies the elder of Womenswold, co. Kent, yeoman
February 1640
Abstract
Doyley complained that Jefferies had told him in January 1640 that Doyley's 'father might be a sheppard for ought he knew and that he was as good a man as thou', and 'that a yeoman is as good as a gent; and that he could be a gent if he would'. When Doyley replied that 'my Lord Marshall made a difference betweene a gent and a yeoman', Doyley responded that 'he could be a gent. if he pleased.' Process was granted on 15 February 1640, but no further proceedings survive.
Initial proceedings
2/8, Petition to Arundel
Doyley, 'a gentleman of an auntient family, was much abused by one Francis Jefferies of Wimslingswold [Womenswold], co. Kent, the elder, yeoman, who told him in the month of January anno dm. 1639 that his father might be a sheppard for ought he knew, and that he was as good a man as thou, speaking to Edward Doyley and that a yeoman is as good as a gent.; and that he could be a gent if he would. And Edward Doyley speakinge that my Lord Marshall made a difference betweene a gent. and a yeoman, he, Francis Jefferies, said that he could be a gent if he pleased.'
Petitioned that Jefferies be brought to answer.
Maltravers granted process on 15 February 1640.
Notes
Neither Edward Doyley nor Francis Jefferies appear among the 1619-21 and 1663-8 Visitations of Kent: R. Hovenden (ed.), The Visitation of Kent taken inthe years 1619-21 (Publications of the Harleian Society, 42, 1898); G. J. Armytage (ed.), A Visitation of the County of Kent, 1663-8 (Publications of the Harleian Society, 54, 1906).
Documents
- Initial proceedings
- Petition to Arundel: 2/8 (15 Feb 1640)
People mentioned in the case
- Doyley, Edward, gent
- Howard, Henry, baron Maltravers
- Howard, Thomas, earl of Arundel and Surrey
- Jefferies, Francis, the elder
Places mentioned in the case
- Kent
- Womenswold
Topics of the case
- allegation of tradesman status
- calling thou
- comparison
- denial of gentility