The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640.
This free content was Born digital. CC-NC-BY.
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '160 Dingley v Ghest', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640, ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/160-dingley-ghest [accessed 21 November 2024].
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '160 Dingley v Ghest', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Edited by Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online, accessed November 21, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/160-dingley-ghest.
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper. "160 Dingley v Ghest". The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online. Web. 21 November 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/160-dingley-ghest.
In this section
160 DINGLEY V GHEST
Francis Dingley of Clifford's Inn, London, gent v Charles Ghest of the city of Worcester
June 1636 - February 1637
Abstract
Dingley complained that Ghest had spoken scandalous words. Proceedings were under way by June 1636, but in February 1637 Ghest was being penalised for non-appearance. No indication of sentence survives.
Documents
- Proceedings
- Proceedings before Sir Henry Marten: College of Arms MS. 'Court of Chivalry' (act book, 1636-8) [pressmark R.R. 68C] (hereafter 68C), fos. 122r-124v (3 June 1636)
- Proceedings: 68C, fos. 105r-110v (8 Nov 1636)
- Proceedings before Arundel: 68C, fos. 51r-59r (28 Jan 1637)
- Proceedings: 68C, fos. 23r-36v (11 Feb 1637)
- Proceedings: 68C, fos. 14r-20v (16 Feb 1637)
Summary of proceedings
Dr Duck acted as counsel. There were proceedings for this cause on 3 June and 8 November 1636. Ghest was required to appear on 28 January 1637. Penalty was reserved for Ghest on 11 February for non appearance, and there were further proceedings on 16 February.
Notes
A Charles Ghest of Broadwas appeared in the Visitation of 1634, son of Edmund Ghest and Jane, daughter of John Tripp of co. Kent. Charles married Penelope, daughter of Thomas Chamberlain of Broadwas. Francis Dingley did not appear in the Visitations of Worcester of London.
A. T. Butler (ed.), The Visitation of Worcestershire, 1634 (Publications of the Harleian Society, 90, 1938), p. 38; J. Jackson Howard and J. L. Chester (eds.), The Visitation of London, 1633, 1634 and, 1635, vol. I (Publications of the Harleian Society, 15, 1880); J. Jackson Howard (ed.), The Visitation of London, 1633, 1634 and, 1635, vol. II (Publications of the Harleian Society, 17, 1883); J. B. Whitmore and A. W. Hughes Clarke (eds.), London Visitation Pedigrees, 1664 (Publications of the Harleian Society, 92, 1940).
People mentioned in the case
- Chamberlain, Penelope
- Chamberlain, Thomas
- Dingley, Francis, gent
- Duck, Arthur, lawyer
- Ghest, Charles (also Gwest)
- Ghest, Edmund (also Gwest)
- Howard, Thomas, earl of Arundel and Surrey
- Marten, Henry, knight
- Tripp, Jane
- Tripp, John
Places mentioned in the case
- London
- Clifford's Inn
- Worcestershire
- Broadwas
- Worcester
Topics of the case
- inns of court