|
m S Thomas 1626 |
Entry |
The President asked us to report quacks: he named Blanke, DuVal, Butler, Aire and Bugg and the charge against them. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
12 Oct 1632 |
Entry |
B was questioned about Burton and confessed. Told to seal a Release of Errors to the College. |
Action taken |
Fined £10 now, £20 after 6 months, £20 after 1 year. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
22 Dec 1632 |
Entry |
B was charged by Dr HAWLYE with bad practice on Mr Cooke of the Old Bailey. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
B to be summoned to meet the charge. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
1 Feb 1633 |
Entry |
B to be summoned. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
To be summoned. |
|
1 March 1633 |
Entry |
B appeared, accused of suing one Smith in the Exchequer for the fee for curing him of the pox. B said he'd had Dr Cartmeale's directions. Accused of bad practice re Mr Cooke, B said that Dr LAWRENCE of Gratious Street (474) had called him in, and sent 2 of Lawrence's bills. |
Action taken |
See next. |
Number of crimes |
2 |
|
5 April 1633 |
Entry |
Dr LAWRENCE 474 appeared and was questioned about the Cooke affair. He said he was called in by B! |
Action taken |
[Presumably B was fined and gave sureties.] See next. |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
Fined and gave sureties |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
3 July 1633 |
Entry |
College decided to take out an action against B's sureties for his non-payment of the fine. |
Action taken |
Sureties to be prosecuted. |
|
5 July 1633 |
Entry |
B's sureties appeared and refused to pay. College began lawsuit against them. |
Action taken |
Prosecution begun. |
|
23 Dec 1633 |
Entry |
Mr. Holland of Fanchurche Street, apothecary, was accused by Dr Winston of supporting Mr. B, 'whoe stands in opposition with the Colledge.' H denied it. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
None to B. |
|
17 Jan 1634 |
Entry |
B's bills were presented. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
?See next. |
|
m Palm Sun 1634 |
Entry |
Dr Clarke complained of B's bad practice in the case of Mr Rowe of Fenchurch Street and cited COOKE, apothecary (?184, q.v.) as a witness. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Second initiator of the complaint |
other medical practitioner |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
See next. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
3 July 1630 |
Entry |
B, of Warwick Lane, was charged in connection with the son of Mr Murray of Foster Lane, whom he had treated and who had died. B refused to answer the charges of Dr Grent's servant and was found by the College 'very insolent'. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
defiant |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
16 July 1634 |
Entry |
'It is thought fitt to respitt the consideracion of Dr. Buggs his practize till next Michelmas.' |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Investigation deferred until Michaelmas. |
|
12 Sep 1634 |
Entry |
Dr. Clement, Registrar, sent a letter from the College to Dr. Collins, Regius Professor at Cambridge, complaining that some graduates in arts of foreign universities were being awarded 'the highest honours in medicine from you'. He cited particularly B, an apothecary who had taken a doctor's degree at Leyden after only 'a month or two' and who had been incorporated at Cambridge on that degree. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Regius Prof at Cantab was asked to examine B's worth. |
|
15 Sep 1634 |
Entry |
Dr B to be arrested 'with a quo minus out of the Exchequer forthwith'. Meanwhile, Prof. Collins had written from Cambridge to say that although B obtained a grace to be incorporated MD Cantab, he never appeared to answer Collins's questions, so the grace was invalid and B is NOT MD Cantab. But B may have got the University's licence to practice, although not from Collins. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
College decided to arrest him. |
|
5 Nov 1634 |
Entry |
'Dr. Spicer informed that Mr. Holland in Fanchurche street Apothecarye preferred Dr. Buggs stranglye, the particulars therof hee will deliver.' |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Particulars to follow. |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
5 June 1635 |
Entry |
Richard Chalenor said that the apothecary HAUGHTON 378 (qv) had brought B the urine of Nicholas Chalenor, apprentice to Timothy Younge of Cornhill. B had examined it and then prescribed a medicine for NC, who took it and died. |
Initiator of the complaint |
relative of the patient |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
? |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
11 Dec 1635 |
Entry |
'Dr. Winston ... presented the books of the examinacions of the Apothecaryes, and Dr. Buggs, which are to bee compared.' |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
20 May 1636 |
Entry |
The College was worried that B might obtain the vacant post in Christ's Hospital, and discussed how prevent this. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Coll to write letter to Lord Mayor against B. |
|
21 May 1636 |
Entry |
The President of Christchurch hospital intended to make B the hospital physician. College presented a petition to the Lord Mayor, arguing against the appointment. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Petition sent to Lord Mayor against B. |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
13 Feb 1637 |
Entry |
'It was allso ordered that Mr. Buggs should be required to appeare before the President and Censors vpon Friday the 17 heerof.' |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
To be summoned for Friday 17th February. See next. |
|
17 Feb 1637 |
Entry |
B appeared and admitted to having practised for 2 years, viz. since he'd come back as MD of Leyden. He had been to no university, but had trained in an apothecary's shop. President read B the Statutes and prohibited him from practice, advising him to go back to being an apothecary for his livelihood, and offering him the favour of the College & half the practice of some of the Fellows. B refused. |
Attitude of the accused |
confessed |
Action taken |
Prohibited from practice. See next. |
|
12 Nov 1630 |
Entry |
Nicholas Martin of Fetter Lane accused B of saying that he was a physician, of giving him (M) false hope about his son and of then charging a fee. M and Isabella Wertley also said that B had given a vomit to Pikhurne, which had made him unconscious for 3 hours. Mr HILL 395 (q.v.) followed B, it was alleged. |
Initiator of the complaint |
relative of the patient |
Second initiator of the complaint |
friend/neighbour/acquaintance of the patient |
Action taken |
Deferred until HILL could be summoned. |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
Number of crimes |
2 |
|
21 April 1637 |
Entry |
B to be sued for 2 years' practice. |
Action taken |
College decided to sue B for unlicensed practice. |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
To be prosecuted at law |
|
19 Jan 1638 |
Entry |
Suit against B [in process?]. |
Action taken |
Suit against B. |
|
11 Jan 1639 |
Entry |
Suit against B [?in progress]. |
Action taken |
Suit against B. |
|
11 Feb 1631 |
Entry |
B, one of the Queen of Bohemia's players, was included in a list of illegal practitioners who gained immunity as the King's servants. This list was sent with a petition to the Lord Chamberlain. (Others on it were BUTLER 135, TRIGG 746, HILL 395, BLAYDEN 93 and BLANKE 92.) |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Petition sent. Reply said that Coll. could prosecute these people. |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
To be prosecuted at law (?) |
|
23 Sep 1631 |
Entry |
Beadle said that one Walton had died under B's hands. Dr Grent reported that a pewterer of Ivy Lane had said that B's medicine put out his eyes. Also alleged to have given physic to Lincoln's Inn stewards, as was known to Dr Wright. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Second initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Third initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Censors, with Master & Wardens of SA, to search B's shop. |
Number of crimes |
3 |
|
2 Nov 1631 |
Entry |
'Consideration to be had about collecting good proofes against George Butler, John Buggs and William Trigge'. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
College to collect proofs against B. |
|
11 May 1632 |
Entry |
Medicines had been seized from B's shop on visitation from the SA. Lawrence Relfe, servant to the late George Burton, haberdasher, complained of B. Burton being ill, R called B, who sent a clyster by a servant, and later sent syrup of violets & flowers of sulphur. Burton deteriorated & B came & blooded him, & later sent 3 pills. Burton died that night. William Wallye, Burton's man, confirmed story. |
Initiator of the complaint |
friend/neighbour/acquaintance of the patient |
Second initiator of the complaint |
friend/neighbour/acquaintance of the patient |
Action taken |
[B must have been imprisoned - see next.] |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
Imprisoned and fined £50 |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
3 July 1632 |
Entry |
Letter received from Lord Heathe, requesting B's release on habeas corpus (dated 30 June). |
Attitude of the accused |
defiant |
Action taken |
College replied refusing (13 July). |
|
1 Oct 1632 |
Entry |
Clark of the SA asked if B could pay the fine in two stages. |
Attitude of the accused |
submitted to the College |
Action taken |
College agreed, if there was good surety. |