Sheriffs' Court Roll, 1320: Membrane 4 (transcript pp.13-17)

London Sheriffs Court Roll 1320. Originally published by Centre for Metropolitan History, London, 2010.

Citation:

'Sheriffs' Court Roll, 1320: Membrane 4 (transcript pp.13-17)', in London Sheriffs Court Roll 1320, ed. Matthew Stevens( London, 2010), British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-sheriff-court-roll/1320/pp13-17 [accessed 27 December 2024].

Membrane 4


[m. 4] patria	A jury of the venue of Wallebroke is summoned for the next court to recognize upon oath whether Joan of Cateloigne, on Sunday in the Octave of Trinity, 13 Edward II [8^th June, 1320] in the street of Walebroke, assaulted Williams of New Castle with force and arms, and wounded him with a knife in the left ear. The def. is mainprised by John of Alegate and William le Barbier.

fecit legem lex ad quindenam	Richard Borgeis waged his law against Henry Henderman concerning the charge that on the first Sunday in Lent [17^th February, 1320] he failed to pay to the pl., by John of Goldeneye, 16s., as he had undertaken to do. Afterwards Richard comes and makes his law. He is adjudged quit and the pl. in mercy.

lex ad quindenam	William of Norhamptone waged his law against Richard le Ussher, concerning the charge that between Michaelmas, 13 Edward II [29^th Sept, 1319] and the Easter following [30^th March, 1320] he bought of the said Richard in London a tanned hide worth 33s., the which sum is still unpaid.

	Walter of Baldok, 'chaundeler', was attached to answer Richard of Bitterle in a plea of account. The pl. complains that the def. was-
[p. 14] patria	-his receiver for the moneys taken by the sale of salt at Billynggesgate to the value of £8.0.0, between Saturday after Christmas, 13 Edward II [29^th December, 1319] and the Saturday next following, but that he refused and still refuses to render account of the same. The def. denies that he was the pl.'s receiver and offers to wage his law. The pl. says that it is manifestly a case for a jury, and that the def. ought not to be admitted to wage his law ['dicit quod in huiusmodi placitis compoti, ubi pars querens narrando asserit versus suum receptorum, de recepcione denariorum proveniencium de certis denarratis venditis unde patria manisfestam cognicionem habere potest, pars defenders in placito compoti secundum consuetudinem civitatis ad legem suam admitti non debet' etc.]. The court adjourns for consultation. Later the def. again appears and denies the charge, and puts himself upon a jury, which is summoned for the next court.

lex ad quindenam misericordia	John of Wroteham claims against Roger le Rede, baker, 18s. for a quarter of corn sold to him in London on Wednesday before Christmas, 10 Edward II [22^nd December, 1316] at Queenhithe. The def. says he paid the sum in question, the pl. denies it, and offers to wage his law thereupon. Later he comes and makes his law. It is adjudged that he recover the sum in question. Def. in mercy.

[m. 4d.]	Court of John of Preston, sheriff of London, held on Thursday after the feast of the Translation of St. Thomas the Martyr, 14 Edward II [10^th July, 1320]

	Walter of Baldok, chaundeler, def., v. Richard of Bitterle, in a plea of account, by R. of Rothyngge.
	Alice la Joignour, def., v. Reginald atte Conduit in a plea of debt, by Salamon of Buri.
	Robert of Kent, of London, def., v. Thomas of Spaigne in a plea of account, by the same.
	John of Cornhulle, attorney of Stephen Aleyn, def., v, Richard Cros, 'pessoner', in a plea of debt after the love-day, by Nicholas of Krenele.
	Adam Orpedeman, attorney of Richard of Caumpedene, def., v.William le Gardyner concerning the hearing of his suit in a plea of debt, by Scot.
	Richard of Wandelesworthe, def.,v, John of Wrotham in a plea of debt, by S. of Buri.
	Richard le Pursere, def., v. William of Craye and Mabel his wife in a plea of debt, concerning the making of his law, by R. Scot.
	William Steward, 'coupere', def., v. John of Horwode, concerning the making of his law in a plea of debt, by the same.
	John of Excestre, def., v. Roger Poyntel, concerning the making of his law in a plea of debt, by the same.
proxima	Richard of Kent, sen., def., v, Robert of Westelee in a plea of account,-
[p. 15]	-by the same.
summonitio	Robert of Uptone, def., v. John of Pickenham concerning the making of his law in a plea of debt, by T. Orpedman.
	William le Gauger, def., v, Roger of Suthcote in a plea of trespass, by John Stulbard.
	Richard atte March and Agnes his wife, defs., v. Roger le Rede and Margery his wife in a plea of trespass, whereupon a jury, by Rothynnge.
curia episcopi Londoniensis	Mabel of Hakeneie, def.,v. Katherine of Kretyngge in a plea of detention of chattels, by Thomas Orpedeman.
	Ralph, son of Roger Bordel of Goldesburgh, def., v. Richard of Belyngtone in a plea of account, by the same.
	William of Hedersete, pl., v. Reginald of Thurston in a plea of trespass, by the same.
	Lawrence of Bodele, def., v. Gerard le Fruter in a plea of debt, by the same.
proxima	Thomas of Hales, def., v. William of Excestre in a plea of detention of chattels, by the same [concerning the production of his suit in a plea of debt].
	Richard, a witness of William le Gardyner, pl., v. Richard of Caumpedene
	Richard, another witness of the same William, v. the same concerning the same.
	Thomas of Norhamptone, pl., v. Master Walter of Thorp and John of Leutone in a plea of debt, by Rothyngge.
proxima	Hamo le Barber, def., v. Eustace Aleyn of Risyngge in a plea of trespass, concerning the hearing of his judgment, by the same, by record.
	Richard of Reynham, def, v. the same concerning the same, by the same, by record.
	Thomas le Brewere, pl., v. David of Leicestre in a plea of trespass, by the same.
	John of Brymmesle, sen., def., v. Simon of Donyngtone in a plea of debt, by the same.
	Ralph le Shoemaker, def., v. Nicholas atte Castel in a plea of the detention of one supertunic, by the same.
	John of Writele, chaucer, def., v. Stephan of Uptone in a plea of trespass, by the same.
proxima	Thomas Frembaud, one of the executors of the will of Nicholas Frembaud, def, v. Thomas Coke in a plea of debt, by the same.
	Hamo le Chaundeler, def., Robert of Stouwe and Joan his wife in a plea of trespass, by the same.
	Martin of Aumesburi, def., v. Robert de la Porte in a plea of trespass, by the same.
	Richard of Hailes, def., v. the same, by the same, concerning the same.
	John of Offord, potter, def., v. Richard of Gloucestre, alderman, in a plea of debt.
	John of Hadham, def., v. the same concerning the same.
	Richard of Bromefeld, def., v. the same , concerning the same.
proxima	John Dosynoun, def., v. Hugh le Fourbour in a plea of covenant.
	William of Eli, pelter, def., v. Margery le Bonere in a plea of debt.
[p. 16]	John of Mallyngge, goldsmith, def., v. John of Brechesford, executor of the will of John of Brechesford, John of Zepewelle and Alice his wife, co-executors of the will of the same John, in a plea of debt. Isabella, wife of John of Mallynge, appears.
	Walter of Halghford, goldsmith, def., v. John of Zepewelle and Alice his wife in a plea of debt.
	Henry of Farnberwe, coffrer, pl., v. John of Bardeneye, son of Walter of Bardeneie, in a plea of trespass.
	The same John, def., v. the aforesaid Henry, concerning the same.
	John de la Barre, def., v. Richard Cros, in a plea of the detention of chattels.
	John le Mareschal, def., v, Adam of Keteryngge in a plea of trespass.
proxima	Margaret relict of Ralph of Farneham and John Sausemer, executors of the will of Ralph of Farneham, def., v. Robert Dummone, in a plea of debt.
proxima	James Beauflor, citizen and vintner of London, def., v. Giles Fanward, merchant of Pere in Agenios in a plea of debt.
	Hugh of Paris and Alice his wife, defs., v. John Brus and Christina his wife, in a plea of debt.
	Thomas of Danyngtone, shoemaker, def., v. Adam of Wederhale and Idonea his wife in a plea of trespass.
	Simon le Armurer of Fletestrete, def., v. Richard of Nasyngge, 'gerdlere', in a plea of trespass.
	Hugh of Warewik, def., v. Robert Paternoster, brewer, in a plea of trespass.
	William of Coule, pl., v. Richard Berard in a plea of debt, by Nicholas of Kranele.
	Simon le Bothoner, pl., v. David of Totteburi in a plea of account, by [blank space].
	Roger of Suthcote, pl, v. John of Lanfare in a plea of debt, by [blank space].
	Roger of Lyncolne, def., v. Robert de la Porte in a plea of trespass, by [blank space].
	Geoffrey of Haidene, def., v., the same Robert, by the same.
	William of Castre, def., v. the same, by the same.
d. a. s.	Roger le Rede, baker, def., v. John of Wrotham in a plea of debt, by [blank space].
	Richard of Wandelesworth, def., v. the same John in a plea of debt, by [blank space].
	William of Bordeux, pl., v. Robert of Haselarton in a plea of trespass.
	William le Spencer, pl., v. Philip Hakenaman in a plea of debt.
d. a. s.	John Coppedoke, pelter, def., v. John of Dallyngge, jun., in a plea of debt.
	Martin Bright, poulter, def., v. the same, by the same.
	John atte Hulle, 'cordewaner', def., v. the same, by the same.
	Estmar le Litle, pl., v. Roger Morice, butcher, in a plea of debt, by [blank space].
	John Stailliard and Alice his wife, def., v. Agnes relict of James le Botiller, John of Hardyngham, Geoffrey le Botoner and William of Macchyngge, executors of the will of the said James, in a plea of debt, by R. de Rothyngge.
summonitio	William of Codyngton, def., v. John Tedmar, concerning the making of his law in a plea of debt, by the same.
	Ralph Manyman, pl., v. William of Honesdone in a plea of covenant, by S. of Buri.
	The same Ralph, pl., v. Lawrence of Hadham in a plea of trespass, by [blank space].
summonitio	Roger le Paumer, def., v. Henry of Ware, concerning the making of-
[p. 17]	-his law in a plea of debt, by J. Stulbard.
	William of Speresholte and Alice his wife, defs., v. Richard of Reynham, and Nicholas atte Holmes and Lucy his wife, executors of the will of the said Nicholas, in a plea debt.
	William of Loundres, 'chaundeler', def., v. the same executors in a plea of debt, by the same.
summonitio	William of Norhamtone, def., v. Richard le Ussher, concerning the making of his law in a plea of debt.
	Rose la Brewestere, def., v. Simon le Bothoner, in a plea of debt, by the same.