LAMBE, John

Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database. Originally published by Centre for Metropolitan History, London, 2004.

This free content was born digital. All rights reserved.

Citation:

Margaret Pelling, Frances White, 'LAMBE, John', in Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database( London, 2004), British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/lambe-john [accessed 31 October 2024].

Margaret Pelling, Frances White, 'LAMBE, John', in Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database( London, 2004), British History Online, accessed October 31, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/lambe-john.

Margaret Pelling, Frances White. "LAMBE, John". Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database. (London, 2004), , British History Online. Web. 31 October 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/lambe-john.

In this section

John LAMBE

Biography

Name John LAMBE
Gender Male
Primary occupation medical empiric (Empiric. Magician &c. Astrologer.)
Period of medical practice 1609-1628
Date of birth ?1545
Date of death June 1628
Address London 1608-28 & Worcester before/during.
Other notes Accused of practice & of magic 1619. Examined 1627. V Clark i 259 & Goldstein article. Protégé of & alleged procurer for Buckingham, murdered by London crowd in June 1628 - see ballad.

Censorial hearings

7 May 1619
Entry Matthias Evans of the Minories testified that L, a quack and a magician, called 'all ye Collegiates asses and dunces', and asked £40-£50 for cures. He promised Evans half the profits, but did not give them. Evans gave a list of 17 cases, including fortune telling and illusions [details given]. L was called 'a notable Mountebank and Imposter'.
Initiator of the complaint friend/neighbour/acquaintance of the patient
Action taken ?
Verdict case not completed
18 Dec 1627
Entry Bishop Durham sent a letter on L's behalf; the College was unimpressed because L was notorious 'due to his knowledge of magic, astrology and of other mystic sciences'. For this reason he was generously supported by women of rank. L had fooled Bishop Durham to get himself out of prison. He was examined and found entirely ignorant, and this was reported to the Bishop. L said he had done nothing to encourage his following, but only sold 'fooleries' for monetary gain.
Attitude of the accused denied
Pressure applied by College yes
Action taken ?
Verdict case not completed
PreviousTable of contentsNext