|
m Palm Sun 1623 |
Entry |
SAUNDERS (qv, 648) reported that Mrs Nokes of Wapping, a midwife, had obtained julep and cordials from Holland in Fan Church Street, and had given them to Mrs Southen of Wapping. |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
28 March 1629 |
Entry |
H appeared and asked to be licensed. However, he was found guilty of 'much slackness' and dismissed. |
Attitude of the accused |
asked for College membership |
Action taken |
Request refused - not licensed. Dismissed. |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
Dismissed |
|
22 Dec 1629 |
Entry |
H paid £5 fine, the judgement on him was rescinded and he was 'received into the favour of the College'. |
Attitude of the accused |
submitted to the College |
Action taken |
Forgiven and taken into favour on payment of £5 fine. |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
23 Sep 1631 |
Entry |
H, apothecary of Fenchurch Street, was said by Dr HODSON to have given medicine to Mr Thackroe. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
To be summoned. |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
25 June 1633 |
Entry |
Dr Hamaeus said that H let blood. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
23 Dec 1633 |
Entry |
H denied combining with BUGGS (130, qv) against the College, but admitted having made medicines after his return from abroad last Michaelmas - e.g. for Mr Blande. |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
18 Oct 1634 |
Entry |
The President asked if H was suspended. He was told that he was not. |
Action taken |
? |
|
5 Nov 1634 |
Entry |
Dr SPICER said that H in Fanchurche street 'prefers Dr Buggs stranglye'. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
SPICER to supply particulars. |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
25 June 1635 |
Entry |
[Apothbiz.] In list of boycotted apothecaries. |
Action taken |
Discommuned (boycotted). |
|
3 July 1635 |
Entry |
'Robert Holland Apothecarye dwelling in Fanechurche street is to bee cited.' |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
To be summoned. |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
20 Oct 1637 |
Entry |
Censors visited H's shop and found bills from 'empiric and ignorant mountbanks', diaphoenicon and catholicon mixed, and 'a mingled invention of spiritus T and tincture of Castoreum' (not done according to the Pharmacopoeia Londinensis). These were destroyed. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Second initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Third initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
Bad drugs destroyed. (H to appear.) |
|
1 Sep 1626 |
Entry |
H was accused by Henry Leck, gardener, but brought Dr Spicer's bill and witnesses. |
Initiator of the complaint |
person unconnected with the patient or the case |
Attitude of the accused |
denied |
Action taken |
? [Presumably vindicated.] |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
26 Oct 1637 |
Entry |
H appeared. He was reminded of his promise of better conduct. Shown a bill of BUGGS's found in his shop, he could not read it in true Latin. |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
Warned |
|
7 Sep 1627 |
Entry |
H was accused of giving 21 pills to Mr Edward Gill of Cheape. He denied it and was dismissed. |
Attitude of the accused |
denied |
Action taken |
Dismissed. |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
2 Nov 1627 |
Entry |
H, called Henry Holland erroneously (according to a note in the margin of the next entry), was charged by Dr Clarke and Dr Saunders with practice in the case of the late Mr Buffield, of Mr Haslewood's son, of Mr Gardiner, of John Hide and of one Throckmorton. H was ordered to appear. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Ordered to appear. |
Number of crimes |
5 |
|
22 Nov 1627 |
Entry |
H appeared and was accused by Dr Goulston, Dr Spicer, Dr Saunders and (especially) Dr Clarke of malpractice and of passing himself off as a physician. His defence was inept and all the 21 Fellows present undertook to boycott him. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Second initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Third initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Attitude of the accused |
denied |
Action taken |
To reappear. |
|
7 Dec 1627 |
Entry |
H was gravely charged by Dr Saunders and others. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
Fined £5 and to be imprisoned unless he paid it. |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
Fined £5 and to be imprisoned unless/until he paid |
|
m S Thomas 1627 |
Entry |
H to be interdicted. |
Action taken |
To be banned (interdicted). |
|
1 Feb 1628 |
Entry |
H confessed giving rose aloe pills to one Gells of Cheapside, and a powder to a boy. |
Attitude of the accused |
confessed |
Action taken |
? (See next?) |
Number of crimes |
2 |
|
7 April 1628 |
Entry |
H appeared and denied the charges. Dr Raven affirmed against him. |
Attitude of the accused |
denied |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|