HIXES, Mr [Thomas]

Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database. Originally published by Centre for Metropolitan History, London, 2004.

This free content was born digital. All rights reserved.

Citation:

Margaret Pelling, Frances White, 'HIXES, Mr [Thomas]', in Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database( London, 2004), British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/hixes-mr [accessed 25 November 2024].

Margaret Pelling, Frances White, 'HIXES, Mr [Thomas]', in Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database( London, 2004), British History Online, accessed November 25, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/hixes-mr.

Margaret Pelling, Frances White. "HIXES, Mr [Thomas]". Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database. (London, 2004), , British History Online. Web. 25 November 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/hixes-mr.

In this section

Mr [Thomas] HIXES

Biography

Name Mr [Thomas] HIXES
Gender Male
Primary occupation medical apothecary (Apothecary (?charter member SA, 1617))
Period of medical practice 1624-1644
Address Fleet Street, St Brydes parish (1624)
Other notes Trouble 5 Nov 1634. ? = Thomas HICKS 1616, visitation problem, not crime? Papist apothecary 29 March 1626. Dr Moor (Papist) lived with him then. Bills extant 1633, 1635.

Known London address

Fleetstreet
Ward Faringdon Without
Date 1626

Censorial hearings

29 March 1626
Entry Mr. Hicks, Fleetstreet, named in list of apothecaries suspected of papistry. NB: amongst the Papist doctors is 'Dr. Moor at Hixes an apothecarye papist.'
Action taken ?
Verdict case not completed
5 Nov 1634
Entry 'The beadle sayeth that Mr. Hixes Apothecarye reseaving a writt deliuered him for his appearance, sayed hee would keepe the waxe to make a pill, but could not punctuallye deliuer the truthe therof.'
Attitude of the accused defiant
Action taken ?
Verdict case not completed
PreviousTable of contentsNext