|
15 Nov 1622 |
Entry |
H, apothecary, confessed that he had given 15 pills of masticine to Robert Roe, lawyer, but said that Dr Rhead had approved them. Roe had been over-purged by the pills, had wondered whether to summon Dr Argent, & had died of dysentery and haemorrhoids. Poisoning suspected. The Censors could not prove anything against H because H was bound in a higher court. |
Action taken |
Deferred. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
8 June 1632 |
Entry |
H appeared, accused of treating John Smith for a bladder ulcer by giving him 'mercurial medicaments' for salivation, then a purge &c. H confessed and was warned. |
Attitude of the accused |
confessed |
Action taken |
Warned. |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
Warned |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
2 May 1634 |
Entry |
It was reported that H had treated a patient under two bills of Dr Read for £10. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
4 July 1634 |
Entry |
[Apothbiz.] Apossecary. |
|
28 Aug 1634 |
Entry |
Luke Fawnes, brother of Zachary Fawnes, said that H had given Lac Sulphuris to ZF for 5s. and that on taking the third dose ZF had fallen into a fever and had eventually died. Dr Alston corroborated F's account. |
Initiator of the complaint |
relative of the patient |
Second initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
See next. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
30 Aug 1634 |
Entry |
H appeared and confessed to having given Lac Sulphuris, but said that it was not intended as physic. |
Action taken |
Fined £20 and imprisoned in Newgate. |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
Fined £20 and imprisoned in Newgate |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
1 Sep 1634 |
Entry |
'Wheras Mr. Haughton pretends hee is to furnishe Chests for some shipps, Mr. President doth think fitt, that those Chests should bee searched: as also the East India Companye are to bee informed that itt is fitt, that their Chests which they send with phisicke and Surgerye stuffe should bee searched by the Censors.' |
Action taken |
Chests of medicaments provided by H to be searched. |
|
30 Sep 1634 |
Entry |
The process of H's action against John Morecrofte was to be registered in the Annals. |
Action taken |
Facts to be entered in the Annals. |
|
6 Oct 1634 |
Entry |
H had been imprisoned in Newgate until he paid a fine of £20. He had escaped, and the College now wrote to the Keeper of Newgate, Mr. Leighton, demanding £40 (double his fine) for this negligence, quoting 'the statute of the first of Queene Mary' to this effect, and threatening to take him to law if he did not pay. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Second initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Third initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
None to H. (But see next.) |
|
17 Nov 1634 |
Entry |
The Lords committed H until he could be put on bail to answer the College. |
Action taken |
?Reimprisoned pending bail. |
|
5 June 1635 |
Entry |
Mr. Richard Chalenor complained of the death of Nicholas Chalenor. He said that when NC fell sick, 'George Haughton caryed the sicke mans water to Dr. Buggs', who then treated NC. |
Initiator of the complaint |
relative of the patient |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
29 Nov 1622 |
Entry |
H said that Dr Argent had approved his treatment, but Argent said that the pills might have contained poison. |
Action taken |
Deferred. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
25 June 1635 |
Entry |
[Apothbiz.] In list of boycotted apothecaries. |
Action taken |
Discommuned (boycotted). |
|
6 Dec 1622 |
Entry |
Censors sent a judgement to the Judges of England, saying that nothing could be proved about poison in the pills. |
Action taken |
Judgement sent to law courts. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
19 Dec 1622 |
Entry |
John HIDE (qv), servant of Mr. Whetlye, said that HANTON used to intercept the bills which SAVERYE sent to WHETLYE. |
Action taken |
? |
|
4 April 1623 |
Entry |
H was fined 40s. for giving pills. |
Action taken |
Fined 40s. |
Verdict |
guilty |
Sentence |
Fined 40s. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
16 May 1623 |
Entry |
H was fined 40s. in his absence. |
Attitude of the accused |
absent |
Action taken |
Fined 40s. though absent. |
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
7 Feb 1628 |
Entry |
H appeared and complained of threats from a Fellow, and asked if the College was boycotting him. The President said that it was not. |
Attitude of the accused |
defiant |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
|
4 March 1631 |
Entry |
Dr Spicer said that H, an apothecary, had treated a young child. |
Initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
Number of crimes |
1 |
|
22 Dec 1631 |
Entry |
DIODATI 227 (qv) accused H of practice on Mr Taverner, according to the report of William Tayler, apothecary. |
Initiator of the complaint |
other medical practitioner |
Second initiator of the complaint |
college member |
Action taken |
? |
Verdict |
case not completed
|
Number of crimes |
1 |