DUNCOMBE, Sir Saunder

Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database. Originally published by Centre for Metropolitan History, London, 2004.

This free content was born digital. All rights reserved.

Citation:

Margaret Pelling, Frances White, 'DUNCOMBE, Sir Saunder', in Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database( London, 2004), British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/duncombe-sir-saunder [accessed 21 November 2024].

Margaret Pelling, Frances White, 'DUNCOMBE, Sir Saunder', in Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database( London, 2004), British History Online, accessed November 21, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/duncombe-sir-saunder.

Margaret Pelling, Frances White. "DUNCOMBE, Sir Saunder". Physicians and Irregular Medical Practitioners in London 1550-1640 Database. (London, 2004), , British History Online. Web. 21 November 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-physicians/1550-1640/duncombe-sir-saunder.

In this section

Sir Saunder DUNCOMBE

Biography

Name Sir Saunder DUNCOMBE
Gender Male
Primary occupation medical physician (Practitioner of physic. King's servant 1631)
Period of medical practice 1621-1644
Other notes On list of unlicensed practitioners protected as King's servant 1631. Accused 1634. ?Brother of Robert D apothecary freed 1637?

Censorial hearings

11 Feb 1631
Entry D was included in the list of illegal practitioners who gained immunity as the King's servants. This list was sent with a petition to the Lord Chamberlain. (Others on it were BUTLER 135, GLOVER, TRIGGE 746, BUGGS 130, HILL ?395, BLAYDEN 91, BLANKE 92.)
Initiator of the complaint college member
Action taken Petition sent. Reply said that Coll. could prosecute these people.
Verdict guilty
Sentence To be prosecuted at law
10 Jan 1634
Entry Dr Grant (sic) accused D.
Initiator of the complaint college member
Action taken ?
Verdict case not completed
PreviousTable of contentsNext