442 Morgan v Morgan

The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640.

This free content was Born digital. CC-NC-BY.

Citation:

Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '442 Morgan v Morgan', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640, ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/442-morgan-morgan [accessed 31 October 2024].

Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '442 Morgan v Morgan', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Edited by Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online, accessed October 31, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/442-morgan-morgan.

Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper. "442 Morgan v Morgan". The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online. Web. 31 October 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/442-morgan-morgan.

In this section

442 MORGAN V MORGAN

Thomas Morgan of Penrhos, St Cadoc, Caerleon, co. Monmouth, gent v Henry Morgan of co. Monmouth, gent

February 1637

Abstract

Proceedings survive from February 1636/7, but they do not show either the cause or result of Thomas Morgan's complaint against Henry Morgan. [For Morgan as a plaintiff in an earlier case, see cause 441].

Summary of proceedings

There were proceedings with Dr Gwyn as counsel on 16 February 1637.

Notes

Thomas Morgan of Lansoy (b. c.1611), Thomas Morgan of Llanrumney and Henry Morgan of Caerleon Usk were listed as J.P.s for co. Monmouth in the 1683 Visitation. By his second wife, Thomas Morgan of Llansoy fathered Henry Morgan of Caerleon (b.1644).

M. P. Siddons (ed.), Visitations by the Heralds in Wales (Publications of the Harleian Society, new series, 14, 1996), pp. 172-3, 214.

Documents

  • Proceedings
    • Proceedings: 68C, fos. 1r-11r(16 Feb 1637)

People mentioned in the case

  • Gwyn, Thomas, lawyer
  • Morgan, Henry, gent
  • Morgan, Thomas, gent

Places mentioned in the case

  • Monmouthshire
    • Caerleon
    • Llanrumney
    • Llansoy
    • Penrhos
    • St Cadoc
    • Usk

Topics of the case

  • justice of the peace