The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640.
This free content was Born digital. CC-NC-BY.
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '436 Moore v Jenkin', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640, ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/436-moore-jenkin [accessed 21 November 2024].
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, '436 Moore v Jenkin', in The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Edited by Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online, accessed November 21, 2024, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/436-moore-jenkin.
Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper. "436 Moore v Jenkin". The Court of Chivalry 1634-1640. Ed. Richard Cust, Andrew Hopper, British History Online. Web. 21 November 2024. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/court-of-chivalry/436-moore-jenkin.
In this section
436 MOORE V JENKIN
Gawen Moore of Quethiocke, co. Cornwall, gent v Richard Jenkin of the same, yeoman
December 1637 - February 1638
Abstract
Moore complained that Jenkin had given him the lie in October 1637, and called him 'a base knave and a base cozening cheating knave'. Process was granted on 6 December 1637, and Dr Eden presented the libel on 12 February 1638; but no further proceedings survive.
Initial proceedings
3/59, Petition to Arundel
'The petitioner being a gentleman of armes and antient family was in October last much abused by many evill and base words given him by one Richard Jenkin of Quethicke in the countie of Cornewall, yeoman. Jenkin amongst other base fellows in a very opprobrious manner giving the petitioner the lye, and sayeing he was a base knave and a base cozening cheating knave, without any provocation.'
Petitioned that Jenkin be brought to answer.
Duck desired Dethick to grant process, 6 December 1637.
Signed by Arthur Duck.
13/1x, Citation
Jenkin to appear at the suit of Moore for scandalous words provocative of a duel.
Dated: 6 December 1637.
By the special direction of Gilbert Dethick, registrar.
3/60, Plaintiff's bond
6 December 1637
Bound to appear 'in the Court in the painted Chamber within the Pallace of Westminster'.
Signed by Henry Vincent of St Clement, co. Cornwall, gent on behalf of Moore.
Sealed, subscribed and delivered in the presence of Humphrey Terrick.
Summary of proceedings
Dr Eden acted as counsel for Moore, and on 27 January 1638 Jenkin was required to appear in response to a summons. Dr Eden presented the libel on 12 February 1638.
Notes
No Gawen Moore of Quethiocke appeared in J. L. Vivian and H. H. Drake (eds.), The Visitation of the County of Cornwall in the Year 1620 (Publications of the Harleian Society, 9, 1874).
Documents
- Initial proceedings
- Petition to Arundel: 3/59 (6 Dec 1637)
- Citation: 13/1x (6 Dec 1637)
- Plaintiff's bond: 3/60 (6 Dec 1637)
- Proceedings
- Proceedings before Maltravers: 1/5, fos. 1-15 (27 Jan 1638)
- Proceedings before Arundel: 1/5, fos. 23-35 (3 Feb 1638)
- Proceedings before Arundel: 1/5, fos. 38-56 (12 Feb 1638)
People mentioned in the case
- Dethick, Gilbert, registrar
- Duck, Arthur, lawyer
- Eden, Thomas, lawyer
- Howard, Henry, baron Maltravers
- Howard, Thomas, earl of Arundel and Surrey
- Jenkin, Richard, yeoman
- Moore, Gawen, gent
- Terrick, Humphrey
- Vincent, Henry, gent
Places mentioned in the case
- Cornwall
- Quethiock
- St Clement
- Middlesex
- Westminster
Topics of the case
- allegation of cheating
- denial of gentility
- giving the lie