Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 19, 1709-1714. Originally published by His Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1767-1830.
This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.
'House of Lords Journal Volume 19: 5 February 1711', in Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 19, 1709-1714(London, 1767-1830), British History Online https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol19/pp214-215 [accessed 22 February 2025].
'House of Lords Journal Volume 19: 5 February 1711', in Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 19, 1709-1714(London, 1767-1830), British History Online, accessed February 22, 2025, https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol19/pp214-215.
"House of Lords Journal Volume 19: 5 February 1711". Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 19, 1709-1714. (London, 1767-1830), British History Online. Web. 22 February 2025. https://prod.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol19/pp214-215.
In this section
DIE Lunæ, 5 Februarii.
Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes fuerunt:
PRAYERS.
Message from H. C. with a Bill.
A Message was brought from the House of Commons, by Mr. Farrer and others:
With a Bill, intituled, "An Act for the Sale of the Barton and Farm of Pollesloe, in the County of Devon, late the Estate of Sebastian Isaack Esquire, deceased, for discharging Incumbrances thereupon; and for Distribution of the Surplus-money;" to which they desire the Concurrence of this House.
General Naturalization Act, Bill to repeal, rejected:
Hodie 1a vice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act to repeal the Act, intituled, An Act for naturalizing Foreign Protestants, except so much thereof as relates to the Children of Her Majesty's Natural-born Subjects, born out of Her Allegiance."
Then, it being proposed, "That the Bill be read a Second Time;"
And Debate thereupon:
The Question was put, "Whether this Bill shall be read a Second Time?"
It was Resolved in the Negative.
Then the Question was put, "Whether the said Bill shall be rejected?"
It was Resolved in the Affirmative.
Ordered, That the said Bill be rejected.
Protest against rejecting it.
"Dissentient.
"Northumberland.
Jo. Ebor.
Marischall.
"Jonat. Winton.
Berkshire.
"North & Grey.
Conway.
"Gul. Cestriens.
"Annandale.
Abingdon.
Anglesey.
"Balmerino.
Nottingham.
"Beaufort.
"Gernsey.
"R. Ferrers.
"Tho. Roffen.
"Winchilsea.
"Scarsdale.
"Weymouth.
"Ofsp. Exon.
Clarendon. Denbigh.
"Say & Seale. Eglintoune.
"Kilsyth.
Isaack's Bill referred to Judges.
Hodie 1a vice lecta est Billa, intituled, "An Act for the Sale of the Barton and Farm of Pollesloe, in the County of Devon, late the Estate of Sebastian Isaack Esquire, deceased, for discharging Incumbrances thereupon; and for Distribution of the Surplus-money."
Upon the First Reading of the Bill, intituled, "An Act for the Sale of the Barton and Farm of Pollesloe, in the County of Devon, late the Estate of Sebastian Isaack Esquire, deceased, for discharging Incumbrances thereupon; and for Distribution of the Surplus-money:"
It is Ordered, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the Consideration of the said Bill shall be, and is hereby, referred to Mr. Baron Lovell and Mr. Justice Eyre; who are forthwith to summon all Parties that are to be concerned therein; and, after hearing them, and persuing a Copy of the Bill attested by the Clerk of the Parliaments, are to report to the House the State of the Case, with their Opinion thereupon, under their Hands.
E. Plimouth, Leave for a Bill.
After reading, and considering, the Report of the Lord Chief Baron of the Court of Exchequer and Mr. Justice Powys; to whom was referred the Petition of the Right Honourable Other Earl of Plimouth, Elizabeth Countess of Plimouth, and Elizabeth Whitley; praying Leave to bring in a Bill, for the Purposes in the Petition mentioned:
It is Ordered, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That the Petitioners have hereby Leave given to bring in a Bill, according to the Prayer of the said Petition.
Lyde versus Rodd, in Error.
Upon reading the Petition of John Lyde Gentleman, Plaintiff in a Writ of Error depending in this House, wherein Thomas Rodd, Attorney of the Court of Queen's Bench, is Defendant; praying, "That a Day may be appointed for hearing the Errors (assigned upon the said Writ of Error) argued:"
It is Ordered, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament assembled, That this House will hear the Errors argued in this Case, on Friday the Sixteenth Day of this Instant February, at Eleven a Clock.
Adjourn.
Dominus Custos Magnii Sigilli declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Mercurii, septimum diem instantis Februarii, hora undecima Auroræ, Dominis sic decernentibus.